METHODOLOGY

Evidence first.

PepetoScam is intentionally critical. That makes source discipline more important, not less. Every material statement should be attributable to one of the categories below.

VERIFIEDDirectly observed in a primary source, screenshot, blockchain record or authenticated correspondence.

PROJECT CLAIMA statement made by Pepeto that has not independently been established as fact.

UNVERIFIEDA claim for which reliable confirmation has not yet been found.

CONTRADICTEDA claim inconsistent with stronger evidence or a later observable fact.

INVESTOR REPORTA first-person report. It remains labelled as such unless independently verified.

ASSESSMENTOur interpretation or risk conclusion based on the cited evidence.

Why the site is called PepetoScam

The domain and branding express the operator's assessment and criticism of the Pepeto presale. The site does not claim that a court, regulator or payment provider has formally determined Pepeto to be fraudulent unless a source establishing that finding is added.

What we will not do

No fabricated reviews, fake X accounts, coordinated false reports, invented investor stories or claims presented as fact without support. Public criticism is strongest when readers can inspect the underlying evidence themselves.

Personal story

The operator invested in Pepeto after a brief search surfaced positive coverage. The full first-person timeline, supporting payment records and redacted correspondence will be expanded as the evidence archive is organized.